Gregory J. Reigel
Serving clients throughout the U.S.
Tel (214) 780-1482
Email: info@aerolegalservices.com

 
[Top Background]
Wearing Two Hats - Limitations of a Flying Mechanic

By Gregory J. Reigel

November, 2013 All rights reserved.

These days, it isn't uncommon for a company with an air carrier certificate for conducting part 135 operations to also hold a Part 145 repair station certificate. In this situation, the company's repair station business performs maintenance on both the aircraft operated by the air carrier as well as other aircraft. For smaller businesses, it isn't unusual for the company to employ individuals who hold both an airman certificate and a mechanic certificate. Many of these individuals wear two hats for the company: they fly for the air carrier and also perform maintenance for the repair station.

On any given day one of these pilots/mechanics may fly a trip for the part 135 operation and upon returning from the trip he or she spends the remainder of his or her shift performing maintenance work for the repair station business. Alternatively, on some days the pilot/mechanic may spend his or her entire shift, or more, performing maintenance without flying at all. But does it matter how much time the pilot/mechanic spends performing maintenance versus flying part 135 flights? It very well may.

As you may know, the regulations contained in part 135 do not include any duty or rest requirements or limitations for maintenance personnel. Similarly, part 145 does not include duty or rest requirements or limitations for maintenance personnel performing maintenance for part 91 operators or part 135 air carriers. (Duty time limitations are imposed, however, when part 145 maintenance personnel are performing maintenance for a part 121 air carrier pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 121.377, but that is a subject for another article).

On the other hand, pilots flying part 135 operations are subject to flight time and duty period limitations, as well as rest requirements, which vary depending upon the type of operation being flown. And it is these limitations and requirements that the pilot/mechanic must consider when he or she is both flying and performing maintenance for his or her employer.

One specific question that must be considered and answered is "whether time spent by the pilot/mechanic employee doing maintenance for the part 145 repair station must be logged as duty time for the part 135 operation." Two typical situations in which this question arises occur when (l) the pilot/mechanic is performs mechanic duties under the part 145 certificate but then flies, or is expected to fly, if requested by the part 135 air carrier or (2) the pilot/mechanic is solely performing mechanic duties and is not flying for the part 135 air carrier nor is the pilot/mechanic expected to fly is asked.

In order to answer the question, we need to understand what the FAA means by "duty" and "rest." With respect to duty, the FAA considers an individual to be on duty when he or she is actually working for the employer, whether for the air carrier or repair station business of the company, or presently responsible for work (e.g. the employee is expected to work if asked). Rest, on the other hand, means a continuous period of time during which the individual is free from all restraint by the employer; that is, the employee does not have to work nor does he or she have to work if asked.

Looking at the first situation, the pilot/mechanic is required to fly if requested by the part 135 air carrier. Since a pilot is on duty if the expectation exists that the pilot will fly if he or she is asked, the pilot/mechanic is considered to be on duty whether performing maintenance for the air carrier or repair stations business of the employer or simply waiting to be asked to fly.

In the second situation, although the pilot/mechanic is not expected to fly, he or she is, however, spending time performing mechanic duties for either the air carrier or repair station business as assigned by the company. Since the pilot/mechanic is performing work assigned and required by the company, the time spent performing maintenance would not be considered rest. As a result, the pilot/mechanic would be on duty in this situation as well.

As you can see, in either of these two situations the individual's performance of maintenance will have a direct impact on whether and how much the pilot/mechanic may be able to fly for the air carrier. The more maintenance performed, the less duty time available for flying without first receiving the required rest. Depending upon when the pilot/mechanic wants to wear his or her pilot and mechanic hats, he or she will need to plan accordingly to remain in compliance with the regulations.


The information contained in this web-site is intended for the education and benefit of those visiting the Aero Legal Services site. The information should not be relied upon as advice to help you with your specific issue. Each case is unique and must be analyzed by an attorney licensed to practice in your area with respect to the particular facts and applicable current law before any advice can be given. Sending an e-mail to Aero Legal Services or Gregory J. Reigel does not create an attorney-client relationship. Advice will not be given by e-mail until an attorney-client relationship has been established.

© Gregory J. Reigel-Aero Legal Services 2002-Present. All rights reserved.